← Search

Sherri Hammer

— year-end
26 matches · 13W–13L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Sherri Hammer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2022-08-13 · Sugar Bucks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Volyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-08-06 · Sugar Bucks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Volyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-07-16 · Sugar Bucks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rong Nie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2022-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Mangas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2021-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2021-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2021-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chantal Meldrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2021-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Volyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2021-06-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hillis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2021-05-15 · Dynamos · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenna Czumbil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2019-12-11 · PRAC Attack · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Meehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Gail Wendel / Helena Carr
2019-11-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Jolin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-3
Teams4 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 50.2% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert