← Search

Carole Sanderson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Novelty, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
344 matches · 189W–155L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history344 matches
L
2026-09-26 · C 7.5W MV2 Zhang · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yulia Lyublinski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-19 · C 7.5W MV2 Zhang · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelley Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · 55 7.0W E MV2 O'Shaughnessy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathleen Stover
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Stover
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · 55 7.0W E MV2 O'Shaughnessy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Ellen Elder
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Ellen Elder
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Ellen Elder
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · 55 7.0W E MV2 O'Shaughnessy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Stonehill
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-15 · 55 7.0W E MV2 O'Shaughnessy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Ellen Elder
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.6%
71W–31L · 57.8% of games
4.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 46.9% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.3% of games
7.0
72.1%
31W–12L · 59% of games
7.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 50.1% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
19W–19L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
82 matches
Singles
22%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
63 matches
#1 Singles
17%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
45 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe