← Search

Richard Rehm

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
ATLANTA, GA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 11W–25L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history36 matches
W
2026-10-22 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kim mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Roman mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-20 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Zachowski mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-12 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Zachowski mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-24 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Zachowski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-10-03 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Risa Ramji mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-09-19 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Zachowski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-09-12 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kim mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
Patrick Williams / Adriane Ivey
2025-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Roman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kim mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kim mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kim mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
20.8%
5W–19L · 42.6% of games
3.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams