← Search

Jim Sanger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Worth, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 118W–69L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history187 matches
W
2026-10-10 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danny Le
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · RTC WEBSTER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · RTC WEBSTER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · RTC WEBSTER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Flaherty
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Webster
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · RTC WEBSTER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danny Fry
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · RTC WEBSTER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Flores
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
67.6%
75W–36L · 57.8% of games
4.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.6% of games
7.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.5% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games
8.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
42 matches
#1 Singles
10%
19 matches
Singles
9%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King