← Search

Sandra Crider

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bakersfield, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 11W–5L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history16 matches
L
2024-04-23 · LLW - Bako - Team Suburu · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Rhodes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-1
L
2024-04-09 · LLW - Bako - Team Suburu · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Bye
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 0-6
W
2024-03-26 · LLW - Bako - Team Suburu · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Seibly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-03-19 · LLW - Bako - Team Suburu · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeannie Munn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-03-05 · LLW - Bako - Team Suburu · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Clark
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-02-10 · LLW - Bako - Team Suburu · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Seibly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2022-02-12 · LLW - Bako - Team Leapley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Rhodes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-01-29 · LLW - Bako - Team Leapley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Rhodes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-01-22 · LLW - Bako - Team Leapley · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Marble
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
W
2022-01-16 · LLW - Bako - Team Leapley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy LEAPLEY
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2020-03-02 · Bake - Leapley/Lerma · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy LEAPLEY
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2020-02-29 · Bake - Leapley/Lerma · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Echeverria
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams