← Search

Rich Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Grafton, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 30W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history60 matches
W
2026-10-25 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Klein championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-10-25 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Klein championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Dubsky championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-23 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Dubsky championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-13 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Horwich
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fritz Byers
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hazem Nouraldin
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Frey
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Reutepohler
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Latham
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andreas Spintzyk
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Frey
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 42.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 57% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 46.2% of games
9.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams