← Search

Stephen Green

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NYACK, NY
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 18W–31L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history49 matches
L
2026-08-05 · EAC, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Mead
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · EAC, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Subject
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-23 · EAC, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Armando Lastra
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-22 · Blue Point, Subject · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with MIKE VOYACK
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-18 · Blue Point, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Nickeson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-12 · Blue Point, Subject · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Subject
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-08-07 · Blue Point, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Henry Winnicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-07-25 · Blue Point, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Deaner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
L
2024-06-25 · Blue Point, Subject · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Henry Winnicki
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-21 · Blue Point, Subject · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian McKeown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2023-08-16 · Blue Point, Subject · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with MIKE VOYACK
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-08-02 · Blue Point, Subject · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jaroslaw Dabek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
36.7%
18W–31L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams