← Search

Todd Hammond

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fond Du Lac, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 58W–114L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history172 matches
L
2026-08-22 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL OshkoshHS Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Perna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL OshkoshHS Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Vanharpen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Gerstein
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-26 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL OshkoshHS Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheri Brannen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Struck
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2026-07-11 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL OshkoshHS Hammond · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Vanharpen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-06-30 · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #2 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Schmidt
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL OshkoshHS Hammond · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Gahagan
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL OshkoshHS Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zita Wenda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-06 · WI Adult Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL OshkoshHS Hammond · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Perna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
43.3%
13W–17L · 50.8% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 40.1% of games
6.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.7% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.2% of games
7.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 49.4% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
22.9%
8W–27L · 41.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–11L · 23.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
49 matches
Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams