← Search

Cathy Cuozzo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ossining, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 41W–33L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history74 matches
L
2026-07-24 · Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55+ 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · CFB Allstars 65+ 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · CFB Allstars 65+ 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55+ 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-08-06 · Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-28 · Club Fit Briarcliff All Stars 65 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-21 · Club Fit Briarcliff All Stars 65 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-16 · Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-07-10 · Club Fit JV 65 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Patone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-09 · Club Fit JV Solar Flares 55 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-17 · Club Fit Briarcliff All Stars 65 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Patone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.6% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
57.6%
34W–25L · 55.2% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal