← Search

Matthew Boles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bradenton, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
206 matches · 140W–66L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history206 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Cavanaugh-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-17 · Cavanaugh-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Reed Bickerstaff
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-12 · Cavanaugh-CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Reed Bickerstaff
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-19 · Cavanaugh-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mattie Albright mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Davis mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Keller mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-1
W
2026-09-09 · Cavanaugh-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · Cavanaugh-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · Simmons-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mike Chancey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · Simmons-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mike Chancey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.9% of games
3.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 55.3% of games
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.8% of games
4.0
72.4%
71W–27L · 60.1% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.7% of games
7.0
94.7%
18W–1L · 60.8% of games
7.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.9% of games
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.2% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 26.9% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
51 matches
#1 Singles
25%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
39 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer