← Search

JoAnne Hangen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
452 matches · 168W–284L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history452 matches
L
2026-10-07 · Hempfield - HangNimm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Franko
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-03 · Hempfield - Hangen40Mx · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Musser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-10-02 · Hempfield Hangen Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Katz
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · Hempfield SWINGERS (Banh) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Danowski-Miller
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-27 · Hempfield - Hangen40Mx · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Musser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-25 · Hempfield Hangen Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Robinson
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-09-24 · Hempfield - HangNimm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dale Heird
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-18 · Hempfield SWINGERS (Banh) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrea Holder
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-13 · Hempfield - Hangen40Mx · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Roeder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · Hempfield - Campbell Tait · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Tobin
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Hempfield - Hangen 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Keller
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Hempfield - Brooks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susanne Nimmrichter
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams116 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
40.4%
36W–53L · 48% of games
4.0
36.4%
20W–35L · 44.2% of games
7.0
39.3%
33W–51L · 46.6% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
18.3%
15W–67L · 36.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
47%
47W–53L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
40.6%
13W–19L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
168 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
165 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
119 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams