← Search

Lucila Robert

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mountainside, NJ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 6W–5L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history11 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Miller's Killers · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chan Feng mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · Miller's Killers · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chan Feng mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-01 · Murphy Madness · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa Ancri
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-2
W
2024-06-24 · Murphy Madness · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa Ancri
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-06-17 · Murphy Madness · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah McGowan
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-06-03 · Murphy Madness · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with EILEEN Leahey
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-13 · Murphy Madness · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Murphy
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-5
L
2021-08-24 · Mixed Nuts · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Armstrong mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-08-17 · Mixed Nuts · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Mayerson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-0
W
2021-04-23 · PEM: Mountainside · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Manelis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2021-03-20 · PEM: Mountainside · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Armstrong mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 46.4% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert