← Search

Carolyn Haarer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alpharetta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 60W–50L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna McCarthy
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-25 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Chernault
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherrill Kirch
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-27 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Gersten
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-04 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Simes championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-25 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Noel championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 6-4
W
2026-02-18 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherrill Kirch
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-06 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Simes
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-29 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Bray championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-28 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherrill Kirch
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-21 · Cambridge (Sherrill Kirch)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Simes
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-01-15 · Cambridge (Tiffany Chernault)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna McCarthy
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
59.2%
42W–29L · 53.7% of games
4.0
44.4%
16W–20L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal