← Search

Anita Spraggs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simi Valley, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 84W–98L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history182 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Nickerson
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-17 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manuela Aschacher
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-11 · Royal Court Jesters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stella Dumlao-Idea
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-04 · Royal Court Jesters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manuela Aschacher
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-27 · Royal Court Jesters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manuela Aschacher
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · Ball Breakers/Lula-Siojo/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brian Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-26 · Triple Crowns · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Leahy
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-26 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hiromi Dever
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-13 · Triple Crowns · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Leahy
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Heitman championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · Triple Crowns · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Leahy
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · V- LLW Tightly Strung- Kapur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kasia Domenech
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
53.8%
35W–30L · 52.3% of games
3.5
45.6%
31W–37L · 48.3% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
7.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.3% of games
2.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer