← Search

Ameline Suson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Burbank, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 44W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history81 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Simply Smashing 3.0/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shenna Dionisio
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-18 · Simply Smashing 3.0/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shenna Dionisio
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-10 · Racketeers/Peralta/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with TARUN TYAGI mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · Racketeers/Peralta-Angrisani/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-20 · Racketeers/Peralta-Angrisani/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Holt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-12 · Racketeers/Peralta/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paul Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Racketeers Mixed6.0/Peralta-Korerat/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lawrence Dunbar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-06-21 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Giovanna Insua
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · Racketeers Mixed6.0/Peralta-Korerat/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Getto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Nelson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · Racketeers Mixed6.0/Peralta-Korerat/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Korerat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · Simply Smashing3.0/MacEwan/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eliza Llobrera
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
58.5%
31W–22L · 54.6% of games
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.7% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.4% of games
2.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer