← Search

Annie Osterman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Southern Pines, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
333 matches · 179W–154L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history333 matches
L
2026-10-19 · Osterman - Lawn and Tennis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Evans
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-15 · Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+ · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Del Metcalf
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-14 · Martin - Sake Tennis 18+ 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christina McKenzie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
Default
2026-10-09 · Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+ · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christen Thayer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-07 · Platt - Lawn and Tennis 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Kirkwood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-10-06 · Martin - Legacy Lake 40+ 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tara Platt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-28 · Osterman - Lawn and Tennis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Howard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-19 · Platt - Lawn and Tennis 55+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Platt championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-18 · Platt - Lawn and Tennis 55+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Platt championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-17 · Platt - Lawn and Tennis 55+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Platt championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-09-14 · Osterman - Lawn and Tennis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Howard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-10 · Martin - Lawn and Tennis 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christen Thayer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
53.2%
100W–88L · 51.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 23.2% of games
7.5
66.1%
76W–39L · 56.1% of games
8.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.5% of games
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 27.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
146 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
87 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams