← Search

Sharlene Bartlett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Surprise, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 88W–116L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history204 matches
W
2026-01-15 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Touzell
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-12 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margie Vasquez
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-08 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosemary Cook
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-11 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Vetter
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-13 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Thomas
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-06 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra White
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-23 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pat Cleveland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-04-19 · 6.0 KIW Net Stalkers W55S · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miriam Spizzirri
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-04-10 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhonda Campbell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-04-03 · 7.0 ISP Howell W65S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Jensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-22 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhonda Campbell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-20 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginny Althoff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
44.4%
24W–30L · 49.4% of games
3.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 37.5% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
53.5%
46W–40L · 51.3% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.9% of games
7.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
45 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams