← Search

Mark Randolph

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 20W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
W
Default
2026-07-21 · CHIP-Lang 55s 9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jan Akervall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-26 · 1CHIP-CAPELLI 90M TH 55&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Jacobson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-07-22 · 1CHIP-GILL AD40&O MO 45 MEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sean Howard
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2024-07-15 · 1CHIP-GILL AD40&O MO 45 MEN SEM · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Tanguay
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-07-11 · 1CHIP-LANG AD55&O TH 90 MEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rick Vach
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-07-08 · 1CHIP-GILL AD40&O MO 45 MEN SEM · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Yorimoto
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-07-01 · 1CHIP-GILL AD40&O MO 45 MEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Gill
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2023-07-17 · 5CHIP-GILL AD40&O 45M MO SEM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Gill
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-07-10 · 5CHIP-GILL AD40&O 45M MO SEM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sean Howard
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-06-26 · 5CHIP-GILL AD40&O 45M MO SEM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Grover
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2022-08-11 · MI/BEZ A55&OVER 9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Warnicke
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-07-21 · MI/BEZ A55&OVER 9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Richard Shaheen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.6% of games
9.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe