← Search

Cherry Jackson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
College Station, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 2W–9L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history11 matches
W
2025-07-24 · Donna's Team · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Kidd
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-26 · Donna's Team · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Stuhrenberg
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-19 · Donna's Team · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-05 · Donna's Team · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Miller
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roxie Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jana DeStefano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jana DeStefano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jimmie Ward
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2020-01-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sinead Dunne
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2020-01-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Britany Graham
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2019-12-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Britany Graham
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 64% of the time
#3 Doubles
64%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams