← Search

Melissa Mercer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cherry Hill, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 28W–47L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history75 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Tennis Bags · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Kaufman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · Tennis Bags · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jayne Rhynard
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · Tennis Bags · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol MacLennan
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-13 · Tennis Bags · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marge Eggie
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · Tennis Bags · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Thurston
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · Tennis Bags · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Kirkland
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jayne Rhynard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Kaufman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Kaufman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Costa
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen McGinnis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen McGinnis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.4% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 45.5% of games
8.0
48.8%
20W–21L · 50.5% of games
9.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.1% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal