← Search

Matthew Ganney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Capitol Heights, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 64W–163L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history227 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laticia Jefferson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-5
L
2026-10-24 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laticia Jefferson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-11 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Lincoln
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-10 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Fetterman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-5
W
2026-10-04 · Chip N Charge · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Lincoln
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-5
W
2026-10-03 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laticia Jefferson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Santos
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hector Vargas
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Santos
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-5
L
2026-03-29 · Chip N Charge · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with LaShonne Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Isaac Bamman
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 55.2% of games
4.0
28.6%
36W–90L · 41% of games
7.5
8%
2W–23L · 36.9% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 48% of games
7.5mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 31.3% of games
8.0mixed
9.5%
2W–19L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe