← Search

Noemi Kapilivsky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 5W–7L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history12 matches
W
2024-08-06 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Alfieri
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-07-30 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Boughter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-09 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Boughter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-25 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Boughter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2021-06-15 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Sangster
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2019-08-20 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Boughter
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2019-06-27 · Baller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Segmond
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2019-06-11 · Boughter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Siebert
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2019-06-06 · Baller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Segmond
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2019-06-04 · Boughter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Silberstein
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2019-05-23 · Baller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Segmond
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2019-05-14 · Boughter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sola Prince
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 83% of the time
#3 Doubles
83%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer