← Search

Todd Hacker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 6W–10L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history16 matches
L
Gary Underwood / Alex Kor
2023-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tom Hoover
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-1
W
Gary Underwood / John Deignan
2023-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joe Gentry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bill Utter
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2022-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Leblanc mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Leblanc mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renee Noe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2021-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Khambula Msiska
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2021-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bill Utter
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
Vince Plowman / Jeffrey Burton
2021-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bill Utter
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2019-07-09 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 5.0+ M, Burton (IRC-D) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Paul Podgorny
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2019-07-02 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 5.0+ M, Burton (IRC-D) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Timble
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2019-06-19 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.5 M, Cohen (PT) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Moe
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.6% of games
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams