← Search

Sandra Hagler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greer, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
341 matches · 202W–139L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history341 matches
W
2026-11-02 · UPTA 40FF/Pavilion/Hagler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Branham
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-10-26 · UPTA 40FF/Pavilion/Hagler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Burnette
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura McNeel championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura McNeel championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-19 · FTA18WD/acac/Tarallo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Sternberg
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-12 · UPTA 40FF/Pavilion/Hagler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Koubek
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-08 · UPTA40C/Hagler/Pavilion · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Saad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-03 · FTA40C/acac/Segura · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Mlady
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-28 · UPTA40C/Hagler/Pavilion · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carlynn Eisner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Haas championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Haas championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-14 · FTA40C/acac/Segura · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Lewis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams98 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.1% of games
3.5
75%
30W–10L · 63.9% of games
4.0
44.6%
70W–87L · 48.1% of games
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 62.5% of games
7.5
65.2%
43W–23L · 56.1% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 55.2% of games
7.0mixed
85.3%
29W–5L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
137 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
77 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams