Search

Jane Early

Tonawanda, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 70W–67L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Jane Early to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Stohl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Mendiola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · BUF: Maple 40M7 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Scinta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-27 · BUF: Maple 40M7 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Scinta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Stohl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Mendiola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
June Brennan / Maura McKenna-Rossow
2026-07-13 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Kaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · BUF: Maple 40M7 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henry Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-01 · Sage/Stohl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Plimpton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Kaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Sage/Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Zolczer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Stohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · Sage/Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Smolinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-08 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Kaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
46.3%
31W–36L · 48.1% of games
4.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.2% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.2% of games
7.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova