← Search

Therese West

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Chester, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 19W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history46 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Jailbirds · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Lucarelli
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Kemeny
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Malley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Malley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Malley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Kemeny
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-08-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Kemeny
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
L
2024-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Kemeny
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Scott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-5
L
2024-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Kemeny
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Scott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Sokoloff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
8W–8L · 48.2% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
37%
10W–17L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 74% of the time
#1 Doubles
74%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer