← Search

Angie Wu

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granada Hills, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
286 matches · 98W–188L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history286 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Double Bypass/Ferraro-Green/Porter · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kyung Min mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-11-01 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hiromi Dever
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-10-29 · Party at the Net · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Jepson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-25 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hiromi Dever
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Yongyuan Wen
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-23 · Vamos Divas/Wu-McDuff/Porter Valley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Youngju Navarro
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-17 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Swagerty
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-14 · No Love Lost Singles/Shafrir/Balboa · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-07 · Party at the Net · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manuela Aschacher
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-03 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Kim
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-01 · Vamos Divas/Wu-McDuff/Porter Valley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Carlin
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-01 · Net Assets/Wu/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Jepson
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 31.4% of games
3.0
48.5%
48W–51L · 49.4% of games
3.5
30.7%
23W–52L · 41.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 20% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.9% of games
2.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.3% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
35.3%
12W–22L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 26% of the time
#3 Doubles
26%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
62 matches
#1 Singles
21%
60 matches
Singles
15%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert