← Search

Natalie Toups

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pensacola, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 28W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history51 matches
L
2026-05-02 · GS - Porter · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · GS - Porter · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · GS - Porter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Middleton championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-27 · GS - Porter · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-13 · GS - Porter · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-06 · GS - Porter · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-21 · GS - Porter · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bernadette Gilliam
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-14 · GS - Porter · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jana Porter
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-03-14 · GS-Mansell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Farrah Keel
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-28 · GS-Mansell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Porter
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-03 · Doubles Jeopardy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jevon Thompson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-02-10 · Doubles Jeopardy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Apanius mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 51.2% of games
4.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 55.6% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer