← Search

Jim Harvey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 24W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history45 matches
L
2026-04-21 · Gr.Kash55A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Payne
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-03-31 · Gr.Kash55A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with William Durland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-05-06 · Gr.Kash55A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Barry Mitchell
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-04-29 · Gr.Kash55A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randy Whitmeyer
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-28 · Gr.Kash55A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randy Whitmeyer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-04-28 · Gr.Kash40A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Randy Whitmeyer
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-03-02 · Be.Koren18A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stuart Donovan
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-09 · Gr.Kash55C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gregory Kash
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-04-09 · Gr.Kash55A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randy Whitmeyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
L
2024-03-19 · Gr.Kash55A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randy Whitmeyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-04 · G.Kash/JKerr · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rob Butler
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-04 · G.Kash/JKerr · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stuart Donovan
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 53% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.5% of games
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 28.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams