← Search

Eun Young Lee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Francisco, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 17W–10L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history27 matches
L
2025-03-29 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Forsthoff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
W
2024-05-23 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicky Perez
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-05-21 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruthanne Tatum
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2024-05-20 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lesley Martin
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-05-18 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shan Lu
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-11 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicky Simonds
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-04-27 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Shaw
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-04-02 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruthanne Tatum
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-30 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Hudson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-02-18 · GOLDMAN TC 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Stevenson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-01-27 · GOLDMAN TC 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Mason
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-01-15 · GOLDMAN TC 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Mason
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 60.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.1% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 41.5% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert