← Search

Eric Shack

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alpharetta, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 63W–68L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history131 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Cambridge (Stephen Mikolajczak)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Shack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-18 · Cambridge (Stephen Mikolajczak)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Shack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-15 · Cambridge (Brooks Stewart)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Beatty
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-01 · Cambridge (Brooks Stewart)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan McGuire
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · Cambridge (Brooks Stewart)* · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ira Feingold
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-18 · Cambridge (Brooks Stewart)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooks Stewart
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 6-7
W
2026-04-24 · Cambridge (Eric Shack)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colette Jeffery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-20 · Cambridge (Eric Shack)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Shack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · Cambridge (Rick Matarrese)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Gijzen
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-12 · Cambridge (Eric Shack)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Shack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-6
W
2026-02-22 · Cambridge (Rick Matarrese)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Stephen
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-02-18 · Cambridge (Rick Matarrese)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ken Rankin
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
48.9%
46W–48L · 50.6% of games
3.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.9% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.9% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King