← Search

Amy Hawkins

— year-end
39 matches · 19W–20L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Amy Hawkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2022-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Bergin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 2-6
L
Kathy Wood / Angela Goodwin
2022-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzy Larocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2022-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gerrilyn Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-01-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marjorie Lowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Nina Kim / Elizabeth Riddle
2021-12-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzy Larocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Marian Salton / Jennifer Baxter
2021-12-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Cindy Seeyave / Kristin Shaw
2021-11-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Bergin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 6-7
W
2021-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Bergin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2021-07-26 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Therese Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 6-0
W
2021-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Sindall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2021-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Breslin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2021-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Breslin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 58.2% of games
4.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
13%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova