← Search

Randy Boyd

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Riverton, UT
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 30W–16L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history46 matches
L
2024-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Kaelin championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-05 · Sports Mall-Sato/Faux · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Murray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-22 · Sports Mall-Sato/Faux · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Murray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-09-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martez Banks championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
Joseph DeMilliano / Matthew Mills
2023-09-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martez Banks championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-07-05 · Sports Mall-Jones/Osley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Osborn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
W
2023-06-28 · Sports Mall-Jones/Osley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martez Banks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2023-06-14 · Sports Mall-Jones/Osley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Black
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-06-07 · Sports Mall-Jones/Osley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with TROY GRANGER
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2023-05-17 · Sports Mall-Jones/Osley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martez Banks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
Frank Johnson / Mark Hutter
2022-09-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Floyd Gordon championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2022-09-16 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chuck Russell championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
65%
13W–7L · 51.1% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
16W–4L · 56.5% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams