← Search

Jason Kamler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greencastle, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 115W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history167 matches
L
2026-10-10 · AP-Brad Intentions · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hans Elmlund
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-07 · Coyne - Volley Llama Mixed Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Struther van Horn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-04 · AP-Brad Intentions · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hans Elmlund
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-30 · Coyne - Volley Llama Mixed Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Turner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-09-20 · AP-Brad Intentions · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Florent Verdier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-15 · Thongphok - 7.5X Slayers · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Ostlie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · Thongphok - 7.5X Slayers · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Thongphok - 7.5X Slayers · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Fluharty championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-4
W
2026-04-23 · B Jacques - BradCakes3.5-4.5Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bradley Jacques
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · B Jacques - BradCakes3.5-4.5Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Grosby
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · B Jacques - BradCakes3.5-4.5Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Grosby
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
61.1%
22W–14L · 53.9% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 59.1% of games
8.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.5% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.8% of games
4.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.5% of games
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
7.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 64.6% of games
8.0mixed
73.6%
39W–14L · 58.5% of games
8.5mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 53% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
83 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer