Matthew Grant
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHANDLER, AZ
123 matches · 68W–55L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history123 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2025
3.5 PTC Fellowship M40F
3.5 PTC The Fellowship M40S
3.5 SRP Scorpions M18F
3.5 SRP Scorpions M18S
7.0 PTC Kosnik X40F
3.5 SRP Scorpions M18S
7.0 ACC SparksCrannel X40F
7.0 PAS VanHof X18F
Fall Win 3.5 MTC Goats M18F
Fall Win 3.5 PAS Edwards M40F
3.5 Paseo Edwards/Higuera M18S
3.5 Paseo Edwards/Higuera M40S
3.5 Paseo Higuera Edwards M40F
3.5 Paseo Higuera M18F
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks X18F
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks X18S
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks X40F
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks X40S
Tri Leclerc
3.5 PTC Chandramohan M18S
3.5 Paseo Chandramohan M18F
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks X18F
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks X18S
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks X40F
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks X40S
Lynch_Grant OcoVill
3.5 Paseo Chandramohan 18F
3.5 Paseo Chandramohan M18S
6.5M AnthCCtr Hoffman Mon
7.0 AnCCtr Sparks X40F
7.0 AnthCCtr Sparks 18xS
Refunded w/ Chase
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
55.6%
40W–32L · 52.8% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 69.6% of games
7.0mixed
51.1%
24W–23L · 49.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.