← Search

Philip Hurley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plano, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 16W–26L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history42 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Team 4 Lifetime Plano/Hoff-Walters M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Hoff
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · Lifetime Plano/Hoff-Walters M7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Rains
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-05-16 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Crosby
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-09 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Crosby
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-04-25 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Crosby
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-04-26 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Shapiro
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-05 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Crosby
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-03-22 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Ohl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-14 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Shapiro
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-11 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Shatzer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-03-24 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Shatzer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2023-03-17 · High Point/Myers M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Shatzer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
36.7%
11W–19L · 48.4% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe