← Search

Denise Kizy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Beverly Hills, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 71W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history126 matches
W
2026-07-23 · BT-McMahon 55s 7.0 DW F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francine Arbit
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · BT-McMahon 55s 7.0 DW F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Ross
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · BT-McMahon 55s 7.0 DW F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francine Arbit
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-08-15 · 4BT-HELLER 70DW FRI 65&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Maley
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-20 · 4BT-HELLER 70DW FRI 65&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Schalek
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-05 · 4BRC-RILEY 70DW TH 55&O SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Morris
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-19 · 4SCWB-SHARMA 18&O AUG TRI 35,30,25 WOMEN SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Bechtel
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2024-08-09 · 2SCWB-HELLER AD65&O FRI 70 WOMEN SEM · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Street
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-08-07 · 4SCWB-SHARMA 18&O AUG TRI 35,30,25 WOMEN SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Bechtel
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-08-05 · 4SCWB-SHARMA 18&O AUG TRI 35,30,25 WOMEN SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Bechtel
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-01 · 3BRC-RILEY AD55&O TH 70 AMW SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Morris
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-07-30 · 4BRC-PERRY AD55&O TU 70 NW SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andree Riley
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
62%
31W–19L · 51.5% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.2% of games
7.0
58.7%
27W–19L · 57.1% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer