← Search

Diane Burns

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlottesville, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 46W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history105 matches
L
2026-07-01 · BHSC - Jordan - Racquet Science · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Jordan
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-29 · BHSC - Jordan - Racquet Science · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Marcus
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · BHSC - Henderson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Burns mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · BHSC - Daniero · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary McFarland
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · BHSC - Daniero · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbie Oliver
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · BHSC - Henderson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Burns mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · BHSC - Henderson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Burns mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · BHSC - Daniero · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Anne Burns
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · BHSC - Jordan - Racquet Science · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindy Kastendike
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
Default
2026-06-11 · BHSC - Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Ward
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-08 · BHSC - Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary McFarland
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · BHSC - Kelley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Fairborn
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.5% of games
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 61.5% of games
3.5
37.8%
17W–28L · 46.9% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.8% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 33.8% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 50.9% of games
7.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert