← Search

Jane Davis

Arvada, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 58W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-08-06 · BRMST NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Gosselin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · BRMST NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Lenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-02 · BRMST NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-19 · BRMST NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Booton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-07-29 · BRMST NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Belton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-22 · BRMST NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-17 · BRMST YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-10 · BRMST YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Booton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-15 · BRMST GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erin Kintzle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-06-12 · BRMST NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Kintzle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-29 · BRMST NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-23 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele Gosselin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50.6%
44W–43L · 49.2% of games
8.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer