← Search

Lisa Charvat

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 84W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history155 matches
L
2026-10-22 · Acebo/LF/40&over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spring Carter
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-21 · Hoffman/PH/40&over3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Negley
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-20 · Harris/PH/Day3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Bishop
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-15 · Hoffman/PH/40&over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaqueline Troyke
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-08 · Acebo/LF/40&over3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spring Carter
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-06 · Harris/PH/Day3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Bishop
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · Harris/PH/Day3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Harris
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-22 · Harris/PH/Day3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Bishop
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-22 · Hoffman/PH/40&over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lucy Bishop
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-10 · Acebo/LF/40&over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Penn
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · Acebo/LF/40&over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Cooper
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · OK/Crossley/PH/55&over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginger Penn championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
60%
15W–10L · 53.9% of games
3.0
55.7%
39W–31L · 50.4% of games
3.5
27.3%
6W–16L · 39.8% of games
6.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 61.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.6% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
32 matches
#2 Singles
9%
14 matches
#1 Singles
7%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova