← Search

Meng Zhang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hillsborough, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 36W–46L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history82 matches
L
2026-06-09 · Match Wiser · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Chung
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · Match Wiser · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tong Zhang
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-6
W
2026-04-30 · West Meadows / C. Martinez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · West Meadows / C. Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-28 · Flight winner/West Meadows Ritas - C. Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-12 · Flight winner/West Meadows Ritas - C. Martinez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-29 · Flight winner/West Meadows Ritas - C. Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-01-15 · Flight winner/West Meadows Ritas - C. Martinez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Estrella Rodriguez
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-08-13 · West Meadows Racquets & Ritas - C. Martinez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Geary
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-2
W
2025-07-30 · West Meadows Racquets & Ritas - C. Martinez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Stack
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-07-23 · West Meadows Racquets & Ritas - C. Martinez · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-17 · NJ: Match Wise · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hazel-Ann Rodney
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 62.5% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.3% of games
7.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 52.1% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.8% of games
7.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.4% of games
8.0mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer