← Search

Allison Bertsche

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 23W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history53 matches
L
2026-10-04 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed Collins-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Collins mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-12 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed Collins-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Collins mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · MSIL 6.0 Mixed 40&O Stoltz-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Hill mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · MSIL 6.0 Mixed 40&O Stoltz-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doug Ellerman mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-22 · MSIL 6.5 Winter Combo Mixed Stoltz-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicholas Troehler mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-22 · MSIL 6.5 Winter Combo Mixed Stoltz-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicholas Troehler mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed INFERNO SMASH · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Delanois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-26 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed INFERNO SMASH · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Delanois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-16 · MSIL A18&O 3.5W McHenry-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra Shanklin
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-05 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Bertsche/Shanklin-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandra Shanklin
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-05-15 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Bertsche/Shanklin-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Prosser
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-08 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Bertsche/Shanklin-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Meysenburg
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
17W–17L · 50.7% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
6.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams