← Search

Arun Nanjappa

Fulshear, TX
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 84W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Arun Nanjappa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Contant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · LLTC - Young Swingers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristin Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Contant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · LLTC - Young Swingers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristin Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Matthew Geisel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · LLTC - Young Swingers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristin Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Randal Lemmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Phi Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
Grant Chambers / Brett Powers
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · with Grant Lopez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Alejandro Gonzalez / Michael Benavides
2026-02-13 · #1 Doubles · with Bill Zindler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-05 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Phi Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-01-29 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Phi Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2007–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 62.6% of games
4.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.9% of games
5.0
50%
5W–5L · 53.2% of games
9.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
90.6%
29W–3L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams