← Search

Jonathan Monson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hoover, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 136W–114L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history250 matches
L
2026-10-28 · HCC - Carden Fall 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Davis
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-21 · HCC - Carden Fall 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blanton Reed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-15 · HCC - Leasure/Monson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Leasure
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-14 · HCC - Carden Fall 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Davis
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-08 · HCC - Leasure/Monson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blanton Reed
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-07 · HCC - Carden Fall 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Black
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-01 · HCC - Leasure/Monson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blanton Reed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-16 · HCC - Carden Fall 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blanton Reed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-09 · HCC - Carden Fall 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Simmons
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-03 · HCC - Leasure/Monson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Schilder
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-01 · HCC - Monson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Lucas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · HCC - Monson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Lucas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
69%
60W–27L · 59.3% of games
4.0
52.6%
40W–36L · 50.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 58.9% of games
7.5
35.3%
12W–22L · 47.3% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games
4.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
66 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova