← Search

Raymond Montgomery

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, IN
— year-end
12 matches · 11W–1L · seasons 2019–2019
Match history12 matches
W
2019-10-17 · CIN Bloomington, Tri-Level M, Piekarsky · #2 Doubles · with Ray Leonard
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2019-10-10 · CIN Bloomington, Tri-Level M, Piekarsky · #2 Doubles · with Patrick Fraser
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2019-09-12 · CIN Bloomington, Tri-Level M, Piekarsky · #2 Doubles · with Brett Franklin
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2019-09-05 · CIN Bloomington, Tri-Level M, Piekarsky · #1 Doubles · with David Chader
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2019-07-18 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Piekarsky (IUTC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Walker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2019-07-11 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Piekarsky (IUTC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Prenkert
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2019-06-27 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Piekarsky (IUTC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Walker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2019-06-20 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Piekarsky (IUTC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Glaholt
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2019-06-13 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Piekarsky (IUTC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Franklin
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2019-06-06 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Piekarsky (IUTC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Walker
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2019-05-23 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 M, Piekarsky (IUTC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Prenkert
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Teams2 teams · 2019–2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
4.0
100%
7W–0L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
50%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer