← Search

Kyle Kimel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Liverpool, NY
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
27 matches · 19W–8L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history27 matches
L
2026-11-01 · WIP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brendan Reagan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · WIP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Funiciello
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
Amy Raborn / Blake Starkey
2023-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mandy Hedderly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Savannah Bryson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2023-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Natalia Tribaldos mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-03-19 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Olivia Dunn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-02-12 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Savannah Bryson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 7-5
W
2022-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christina Tollemache mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christina Tollemache mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2022-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christina Tollemache mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-12-26 · BHRC - Robertson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Kimel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-12-12 · BHRC - Robertson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kerri Owens mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 55.1% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King