← Search

Ann Bolton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Willow Park, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 78W–53L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history131 matches
W
2026-10-23 · RID RUTTER/KELLER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Merry Milliken
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-16 · RID RUTTER/KELLER · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Joslin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-09 · RID RUTTER/KELLER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Joslin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-25 · RID RUTTER/KELLER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Joslin
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-03-20 · RID RUTTER/KELLER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Joslin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · RID RUTTER/KELLER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Joslin
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-27 · RID RUTTER/KELLER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MaryAnn Fearer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-01-19 · TCU SHELTON · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maia Jourde
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-01-04 · TCU SHELTON · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Simpson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-09 · TCU SHELTON · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Tapper
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2024-10-19 · TCU SHELTON · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Weitzer
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-10-05 · TCU SHELTON · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maia Jourde
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
54.4%
43W–36L · 53.6% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
78.4%
29W–8L · 55.4% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer