Calvin Burns
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tempe, AZ
79 matches · 46W–33L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history79 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2025
4.5 PHO Jackford% M18F
9.0 OCO Bond X18F
9.0 PTC Antoniou X18F
9.0 PTC Antoniou X18S
4.5 CTC Rovegno M18F
9.0 X Kiw Rivas
4.5 Kiwanis Oka M18S
4.5 Kiwanis Smith M18F
8.0 Pho VanderG/Gao X18S
8.0 The Pho/ISP Gao X18F
4.0 PTC Davis/Rivas 18F
4.0 PTC Rivas M18S
4.5 PTC Rivas M18S
8.0 Kiwanis Gao 18xS
8.0 PTC Gao X18F
Tri Rivas M
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 63.6% of games
4.5
50%
11W–11L · 50.2% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.7% of games
9.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 49.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
16 matches
Singles
18%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.