← Search

Andrea Nay-Richardson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
East Point, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 45W–27L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history72 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gigi Conner
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gigi Conner
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Richens
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 4-0
W
2026-06-22 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Richens
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-21 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonya Williams
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-17 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gigi Conner
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-01-16 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gigi Conner
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-12-06 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gigi Conner
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 7-5
W
2025-11-15 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Coltrin
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-08 · Sugar Creek (Dianna Kelly)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monique Brown
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
Default
2025-07-01 · Sugar Creek (Dianna Kelly)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Edwards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-06-29 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Cassell
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
86.7%
26W–4L · 65.2% of games
4.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 45% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 50% of the time
#1 Singles
50%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer