Michelle Hannon
82 matches · 50W–32L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add Michelle Hannon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history82 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Jennifer Hatfield / Heather Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Nancy Jones / Lois Callahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 5-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4
Teams58 teams · 2022–2026
PTCTC - Bayne/Serapiglia
PTCTC - Bayne/Serapiglia
PTCTC - Beseau
PTCTC - Wood
PTCTC- Bayne/Serapiglia
PTCTC- Stoots/Simpson
PTCTC/Victoria Serapiglia
SCTA/Cindy Hicks
SCTA/Kathy Wood
SCTA/Victoria Serapiglia
Serapiglia PTCTC Combo
South Fulton (Vickie Ware)*
South Fulton (Vickie Ware)*
South Fulton (Vickie Ware)*
Sugar Creek (Yvonne Hospedales)*
USTA Atlanta/Yvonne Hospedales
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
60%
18W–12L · 51.5% of games
4.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 56.7% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.7% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.